Censorship In Public High Schools

Title	Censorship In Public High Schools
# of Words	1711
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)	6.84

Censorship in Public High Schools

Censorship in Public High Schools: The War For Our Children's Minds:
For centuries, parents have wrestled with the question of how to raise their
children with the best moral and ethical standings. Along with this question
come others such as, "What are the right morals?" Today's parents are
no different than they were in the past and the struggle continues.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
* © Copyright DueNow.com Inc. *
[Category]:
Social Issues
[Paper Title]:
Censorship in Public High Schools: The War For Our Children's Minds
[Text]:
For centuries, parents have wrestled with the question of how to raise their
children with the best moral and ethical standings. Along with this question
come others such as, "What are the right morals?" Today's parents are
no different than they were in the past and the struggle continues. It's
tempting to try to protect children from the perceived evils in modern society.
One such moral issue is the banning of books from high school libraries and
sometimes even classrooms, which may represent some of those aforementioned
perceived evils.
As long as humans have sought to communicate, others have sought to keep them
from doing so. Every day someone tries to restrict or control what can be said,
written, sung, or broadcast through censorship. Almost every idea ever thought
has proved offensive or worthy of objection to one person or another, and almost
everyone has sometimes felt the world would be a better place if only "so
and so" were not around or "such and such" did not exist.
Some people deem this censorship necessity, while still others claim that
these actions impose upon their First Amendment rights. Both sides have some
very worthwhile viewpoints, but lost in the shuffle, unfortunately, is what the
First Amendment stands for - that each of us are free to decide for ourselves
what to read and think. No matter how convinced some may be of the rightness of
their own views, they are not, however, entitled to impose those views on
others. We all have the right to attempt to convince others of our views, but
that doesn't imply a right to blindfold or silence others in the process.
On the anti-censorship side sits the American Library Association along with
a number of other organizations. Part of this group's attempt to further
awareness of censorship takes place in the last week in September. This campaign
is known as National Banned Book Week. This is a weeklong propaganda fest and
consciousness-raising extravaganza put on by the American Library Association's
Office for Intellectual Freedom. The promoters use this week to parade a list of
books that they charge have been banned in libraries and schools across America,
talk about the importance of First Amendment Rights, and lament the rise of
censorship from what they consider to be the ill-informed enemies of freedom and
American democracy -- a group that includes the usual conservatives and, of
course, a great number of parents and school officials.
First of all, quite a few Americans have serious problems with the sort of
radical libertarianism that the American Library Association (ALA) represents. A
majority of Americans don't buy into the notion that public libraries should buy
anything no matter how pornographic, or that schools should teach anything, no
matter how controversial. Most Americans believe in community standards, and
they stubbornly insist that schools, libraries, and other social institutions
ought to support those standards. Even so, the real difficulty with the American
Library Association's Banned Book Week isn't its philosophy, however a number of
people may question the ALA's anything-goes-approach to building a library
collection and managing a school's curriculum. No, the real problem is the
dishonesty involved.
In my opinion, Banned Book Week isn't really what it says it is. It isn't a
model for freedom of speech, but rather the ALA has gone in for some serious
mislabeling here. It has misleadingly categorized the w...

This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Academic Library. Please register below now!

Subscribe to Academic Library

When you subscribe to the Academic Library, you get 24-hour access to the online database containing full-text articles written by thousands of scholarly students. For only $8.95 per month, you receive unlimited monthly access to view and download all of our 40,000 articles available online. That is less than the price of one textbook!
This price includes:

24-hours-a-day, 7 days a week unlimited access on any computer with Internet access

Complete access to all 40,000 articles, essays, and research papers

Ability to view and download virtually unlimited number of documents

Ability to browse through perfectly arranged catalog of articles

Superior search and relevancy ranking techniques using Google SiteSearch and our local search engine

Instant access to the online database after registration

You can pay by credit card, checking account. You get instant access after registration:

You will be billed $ 8.95 every 30 days (recurring billing) starting on the day you subscribe.
Your credit card will automatically be renewed for your convenience until you cancel.

If you are already registered, please click here to login.


	Home \| Register \| Login \| FAQ \| Forgot Password \| Privacy Policy \| Disclaimer \| Close Account \| Contact Us \| Logout Copyright 1998-2007 Academic Library. Academic Library is designed only to assist students and researchers in the preparation of their own work. Anybody who use our services are responsible not only for writing their own papers, but also for citing Academic Library as a source when doing so. By accessing and using this page you agree to the Disclaimer. If you wish to cancel your subscription to Academic Library, please click here.