Problems With Gun Control

Problems with Gun Control


     "If the second amendment does not mean what it says, what about the

first?", this was the question asked by author, and National Rifle Association

member, Bill Clede.  In his article "Gun Control, Press Control", he warns

journalists about the hidden dangers associated with gun control.

     When dealing with the interpretation of the Constitution, there is two

views one can take.  The Constitution can be viewed as a "living document" or in

its "original " understanding.  The original understanding, people are guided by

what the Framers of the Constitution had in mind when they drafted it.  The

Constitution can also be viewed as a living document, in which the

interpretation should be surveyed in light of today's social and politics

environments.  Bill Clede ideas in his article seem to be guild by the idea of

the Constitution being a living document.

     At the time the Second Amendment was written, it had a major impact on

this country because State and National governments were unable, or lacked the

power to protect the people.  This Amendment gave the power to the people to

bear arms for protection.  As Clede points out in his article, it was not the

intent or purpose of this Amendment to bestow unlimited rights upon the people.

The question to ask today is, are the people responsible enough to have the

unlimited rights that they seem to have under this Amendment.  Clede states,

"that does not mean that the government can constitutionally prohibit all

weapons, but it probably means that the government can reasonably regulate and

limit their use."  I agree with Clede's point.  The language of the

Constitution is very vague.  The second amendment states, " A well-regulated

militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the

people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."  Never did the

Constitution define or give examples of what a well regulated militia is or

types of weapons deemed reasonable for protection.  It then should be left to

Congress, or more importantly the Supreme Court to interrupt this vague language.

 I think the government could reasonable regulate guns, without compromising the

second amendment, but like Clede I believe Congress should concentrate more on

who is using the guns and not guns themselves.

     Patrick Henry felt that we should preserve our public liberties, and if

need be by force.  As Patrick Henry stated, "The great objective is that every

man be armed."  Thomas Jefferson and John Adams also held the same views as

Patrick Henry, that every man should have the right to bear arms for private

self-defense.  Our fo
This is ONLY a preview of the article. If you would like to view the entire document, you must subscribe to Academic Library. Please register below now!









Subscribe to Academic Library
When you subscribe to the Academic Library, you get 24-hour access to the online database containing full-text articles written by thousands of scholarly students. For only $8.95 per month, you receive unlimited monthly access to view and download all of our 40,000 articles available online. That is less than the price of one textbook!
This price includes:

24-hours-a-day, 7 days a week unlimited access on any computer with Internet access
Complete access to all 40,000 articles, essays, and research papers
Ability to view and download virtually unlimited number of documents
Ability to browse through perfectly arranged catalog of articles
Superior search and relevancy ranking techniques using Google SiteSearch and our local search engine
Instant access to the online database after registration


You can pay by credit card, checking account. You get instant access after registration:


You will be billed $ 8.95 every 30 days (recurring billing) starting on the day you subscribe.

Your credit card will automatically be renewed for your convenience until you cancel.




If you are already registered, please click here to login.